Many may not agree that an illegal or prohibited act cannot be ruled unlawful or against the law until the wrong dower get away with it without catching the eyes of security or police. However, an American district court ruling just seems to defy all the raison d’etre or logic thinking.
In a latest judgment, a Kansas court of appeals ruled that it’s illegal for an illegal alien to enter the country, but not illegal for an illegal alien to be in the country if he/she can illegally make it past the border without being noticed or trapped by security guards.
The quaint but strange declaration comes after an illegal immigrant, Nicholas Martinez, was sentenced to a year in jail after he was found guilty of possessing cocaine and endangering his young son by forcing him to sell drugs.
The paradox is that the advocates of constitution claim illegal immigration extradition is a civil offense, not a criminal one. They basically, not deliberately though, point out that illegal migrants don’t have criminal rights. What is essentially required is the official evidence that an illegal immigrant is not legal.
Have we really reached the point where common sense means nothing? The main problem is that when the law was written the authors wouldn’t have ever thought that it would come to this, where people take a logical and realistic view of things.
However, the ironic verdict is unkindly and implacably enforced against inhabitant Americans battling (rather suffering) illegal immigration for decades now.
The degree of ambiguity within the system or law is truly grim. This just gives another example how the merchants of law - who are experts at exploiting - can twirl the law to turn the tide in favor or against, no matter the indicted person is criminal or innocent.
Maybe the time has come to make few changes in some of most firm but outdated directive principles, making the mockery of law and order under the nose of the Constitution.
